Author Topic: The fifty greatest artists of alll time (Rolling Stone) (Read 4379 times)

realisthis · « **Reply #30 on:** March 30, 2004, 11:44:45 am »

Horrible song list...

boombox · « **Reply #31 on:** March 31, 2004, 01:59:31 am »

Aaaargh!! I concur, it sucks!!! Good to see a few bits of 60s psychedelia and some recognition for the sorely missed XTC, but most of it is awful. The writer is obviously aware only of VH1 and Golden Oldie shows and reads everything he believes in the mainstream music press.

davepeck · « **Reply #32 on:** March 31, 2004, 06:40:07 am »

blah.

rolling stone needs to do a \'Top 50 Most Meaningless Rolling Stone Top 50 Lists Of All Time\'..

leith · « **Reply #33 on:** March 31, 2004, 12:14:10 pm »

Blender should do that. It would be hilarious,they could have hot models holding the lists w/ a match under each list.

jocelyn · « **Reply #34 on:** March 31, 2004, 12:53:38 pm »

Quote

Originally posted by boombox
Good to see a few bits of 60s psychedelia and some recognition for the sorely missed XTC, but most of it is awful. The writer is obviously aware only of VH1 and Golden Oldie shows

I think some of the soul and motown songs on there are actually pretty huge....

origen · « **Reply #35 on:** March 31, 2004, 01:24:22 pm »

Absence of Grateful Dead clearly the biggest oversight.

Also they can include rap but not metal? Black Sabbath definitely belongs. I\'m sick of Metallica but they still seem like a logical fit for lifetime achievement. Trhrow in Judas Priest, Iron Maiden, and Slayer and maybe you have a list.

News:

Author Topic: The fifty greatest artists of alll time (Rolling Stone) (Read 4379 times)