Author Topic: LMA: 2009-05-16 Toad\'s Place; New Haven, CT (Read 3557 times)

mvallo · « **on:** May 19, 2009, 12:54:36 pm »

Disk 1 Set 1: 01. jam > 02. Tunage > 03. Bouree* > 04. Tunage 05. The Sound > 06. The Vermont Song > 07. The Sound(ending) > 08. Honey Butter > 09. Rush Set 2...

Internet Archive · archive.org

The Breakfast
Toad\'s Place; New Haven, CT
2009-05-16

Disk 1 Set 1:
01. jam >
02. Tunage >
03. Bour?e* >
04. Tunage
05. The Sound >
06. The Vermont Song >
07. The Sound(ending) >
08. Honey Butter >
09. Rush

Set 2 Disk 2
01. jam >
02. What The Funk
03. jam >
04. Metropolis**
05. The Late And The Great >
06. Over Exposure
07. Keyboard Solo >
08. Bass Solo >
09. Drum Solo >
10. Guitar Solo >
11. Taboo Or Not Taboot

* last played 9-12-02
** with bass solo

Recording By Matt Vallo
Soundboard + AKG 480/CK63 -10db/70HZ rolloff > Digi001/protools6.4 @ 44.1KHZ/24bit
Transfer: Digi001 Via Sony vegas; M/S Matrix (m=sbd,s=aud), L3/16 bit dither> Render at 44.1/16bit > CD wave v1.97 > Flac 1.7.1
Note:
There was some clipping form an overloaded effects processor and the gate on the kick drum was popping.

Vassillios · « **Reply #1 on:** May 19, 2009, 12:59:12 pm »

word. thanks

simpletwistupdon · « **Reply #2 on:** May 19, 2009, 01:07:24 pm »

sweet! thanks man!

jking · « **Reply #3 on:** May 19, 2009, 01:19:34 pm »

thanks!

wiredchicken · « **Reply #4 on:** May 19, 2009, 01:51:47 pm »

awesome

peacefrogg · « **Reply #5 on:** May 19, 2009, 02:10:19 pm »

nice. thanks colin! this just made my afternoon 10x better.

ds673488 · « **Reply #6 on:** May 19, 2009, 02:43:03 pm »

sweet, matrix, thanks

snwckgtr · « **Reply #7 on:** May 19, 2009, 03:20:43 pm »

damn now i really hate that i didnt go.....stupid peaches show!

SkyePrizm · « **Reply #8 on:** May 19, 2009, 05:27:21 pm »

after giving it a second listen, definitely liking honey butter also....

zuke583 · « **Reply #9 on:** May 19, 2009, 06:08:16 pm »

Quote from: SkyePrizm;231066

after giving it a second listen, definitely liking honey butter also....

it was a very appropriate song at the time. there was some scandalous **** going on at that point...it was like a mini-sully\'s in there

frolfer · « **Reply #10 on:** May 19, 2009, 08:09:12 pm »

Sweet!!!!

This makes my day so so good.

Thank you Matt for taping and sharing it with us.

Thank you to the Breakfast for continuing to amaze us night after night and show after show.

Ugh, i so want to get to StrangeCreek! Damn life getting in the way.

Ren · « **Reply #11 on:** May 20, 2009, 01:13:14 am »

yeah, those silly girls, i believe one of \'em was trying to **** a monitor...at least that\'s how it looked.

derickw · « **Reply #12 on:** May 20, 2009, 09:42:06 am »

Quote from: Ren;231098

yeah, those silly girls, i believe one of \'em was trying to **** a monitor...at least that\'s how it looked.

like the Howard Stern movie....?

Ren · « **Reply #13 on:** May 20, 2009, 11:49:51 am »

yeah, well no. same reason as the chick in the movie, probably. normally i don\'t like to assume people are on drugs, ya know like, when your watching a movie or a show and someone\'s like, "dude, someone musta been stoned when they wrote that," but if you consider how "into" the music they were, the kinda nasty wook dudes they were with, and the fact that they were grinding, kissing, and one actually massaging the spine of the other one, i don\'t think that assuming they could\'ve been on extacy would\'ve been very far from the truth. if that\'s the **** they were doing for the "lack-luster" first set, i\'d hate to see what they would\'ve done for the second when **** got really good...

ulee · « **Reply #14 on:** May 20, 2009, 04:00:06 pm »

blame it on the a-a-a-a-a-alcohol

"kinda nasty wook dudes" - :lol: