holy cow. i\'ll keep my thoughts short, and will probably get flamed, but whatever, i could care less. a disclaimer: a) i am not as musically \'intelligent\' as most, if not, all of you; in reality I am couch potato first, music fan/person/listener/whateverotherwordistherightone second.
anyways, i have to agree with mr. pecoraro about the \'turning point\', but not completely. the jordan scenario was more or less the steep decline of such point (think line graph), in my opinion. as assanine, stupid, silly, or moronic as it may sound, i think the name change started the slow process. i do however still think it was the correct decision from the \'why it was done\' aspect. but since PB became tB I have seen a) less attendance b) less enthusiasm (not from the band or fans, more or less from people who won\'t even give them a shot, whereas in the past wasn\'t too much of an issue) c) less press. I cannot confirm any of this, just basing it on what my eyes have seen, heard and/or read. Psychedelic Breakfast was a great draw in new england, The Breakfast not so much (yet, hopefully).
Not as short as I though it would be, and not well thought out/explained, but i\'m friggin overtired and am goin to bed. maybe tomorrow i will voice my opinion on the jamband-progrock-trio-fourpiece-etc debate, but probably not (see disclaimer)