Author Topic: Love Lake (Read 9493 times)

Me! · « **Reply #15 on:** March 30, 2006, 03:30:34 pm »

Quote from: leith

Well Chris did ya really xpect anything less? :lol:

not at all :biggrin:, glad you guys are having such a great tim out there wish I was there.

Give us back our band goddamn it!

bonzo · « **Reply #16 on:** March 30, 2006, 03:32:49 pm »

i don\'t know if i like the blues ending or not
i am undecided on that one

FrankZappa · « **Reply #17 on:** March 30, 2006, 04:38:20 pm »

<- never heard the new version.

Drew_Kingsley · « **Reply #18 on:** March 30, 2006, 04:57:35 pm »

I don\'t think that Love Lake should "end" when played in concert. I don\'t have access to the song right now, so I can\'t point out when/where it should segue/jam into space, but I feel like it should.

jking · « **Reply #19 on:** March 30, 2006, 05:02:41 pm »

i think good things is their best blues song, even though its not typical blues. it has the power and emotion one expects from a blues tune, but comes from a completely different (ie more poppy) progression.

Jim Cobb · « **Reply #20 on:** March 30, 2006, 05:11:23 pm »

yeah i wouldn\'t call good things a blues at all.

Me! · « **Reply #21 on:** March 30, 2006, 05:15:33 pm »

Quote from: Jim Cobb

yeah i wouldn\'t call good things a blues at all.

def not....

jking · « **Reply #22 on:** March 30, 2006, 05:44:33 pm »

no, but it has more feeling than any of their \'blues\' jams/tunes. i guess that was my point.

sallyalli · « **Reply #23 on:** March 30, 2006, 05:45:55 pm »

Love lake at the stone church was AWESOME. The whole song was killer and everyone boogied down to it. So I guess I dig the ending.

Me! · « **Reply #24 on:** March 30, 2006, 05:47:09 pm »

I\'ve said this before and I\'ll say it again

Good Things is a GREAT thing. IMO it\'s the most mature song Tim has ever written. Not musiclly crazy, but the pure unadultered emotion it brings out, it litereally (seriously literaly not like I literally shit my pants(so what\'d you do with the pants?) (sorry sidetracked) gives me goosebumps

sallyalli · « **Reply #25 on:** March 30, 2006, 05:48:53 pm »

Good Things is too slow for me. The lyrics are really powerful and its a good song and all...I just think they should be cautious and not play it at the wrong time. I sometimes find myself let down at shows when they go into it.

princesscaspian · « **Reply #26 on:** March 31, 2006, 10:13:29 am »

Quote from: sallyalli

Love lake at the stone church was AWESOME. The whole song was killer and everyone boogied down to it. So I guess I dig the ending.

precisely!!! i was really iffy about the song before, but HOT DAMN, there was not a single stagnant person at the stone church during that jam... gave me goosebumps!

Lexington · « **Reply #27 on:** March 31, 2006, 11:55:11 am »

i don\'t know how they\'ve been ending it lately,but the little vocal overlapping they did at the end of love lake on the Bakers Quad Amherst cd from 2001 fit the tune quite nicely i my opinion

Overexjoesure · « **Reply #28 on:** March 31, 2006, 12:16:38 pm »

I agree with Drew, Love Lake shouldn\'t have an ending. It\'s such a great improvisation launchpad and I think it would be really unique to have a song that you know will lead into unchartered waters and apocalyptic landscapes...

Gfunk · « **Reply #29 on:** March 31, 2006, 12:29:39 pm »

i think the old ending was waaay better. i liked the way they ended it in a round with the lyrics being repeated and what not. i agree with spacy and drew that they should just not end it and instead jam it into a different song, at least sometimes.

as far as other blues in breakfast songs, i love eppi 3 including the blues. damn that mojo mama! the rufus blues aint too bad imo either.

Good Things is a ser tune. it\'s important to have some slow bfast tunes as well and this one is definately one of their best (tied w/ question mark)

News:

Author Topic: Love Lake (Read 9493 times)