Author Topic: New Love Lake is Epic!!! (Read 4351 times)

ChrisF · « **Reply #15 on:** February 07, 2006, 10:42:26 pm »

Quote from: Jim Cobb

looks great chris, i agree with leith about the lights. those intelligent lights are off the hook, but sometimes using them alone makes it really difficult to actually see the guys. just my two cents.

talk to ellis....

i still have more work to do. its not as bad on the wide shot. i just didnt want one static shot for such a long time on the dark part. im going to figure something else out for the dvd, but i thought people would like to see this now.

skalnbyc · « **Reply #16 on:** February 08, 2006, 02:15:53 am »

Quote from: leith

I do not want to criticize too much as I know it will be looked upon as Sour Grapes.

Preposterous

derickw · « **Reply #17 on:** February 08, 2006, 08:38:13 am »

Quote from: leith

Quote from: Jim Cobb
looks great chris, i agree with leith about the lights. those intelligent lights are off the hook, but sometimes using them alone makes it really difficult to actually see the guys. just my two cents.
That\'s all I am saying. I do not want to criticize too much as I know it will be looked upon as Sour Grapes.

.agreed from a photographers stand point. I do everything i can just to get the shots i have.

davepeck · « **Reply #18 on:** February 08, 2006, 09:58:12 am »

yeah, the knit was a VERY dark show. there were times when tim was doing some really cool stuff (lifting the guitar up into the air, etc), but no one could see it, because there was no front lighting..

Todd · « **Reply #19 on:** February 08, 2006, 12:00:29 pm »

I have commented numerous times on the lack of front lighting. The intellies are awesome, but just a little front lighting would help sooooo much for photos. I can\'t even begin to count how may times I\'ve watched a great moment pass by in the darkness.

leith · « **Reply #20 on:** February 08, 2006, 12:02:13 pm »

Quote from: alexanderzurflu

Quote from: leith
I do not want to criticize too much as I know it will be looked upon as Sour Grapes.

Preposterous

What\'s preposterous is Tim ripping into a solo and he\'s in the Dark!!

derickw · « **Reply #21 on:** February 08, 2006, 12:06:51 pm »

Ellis, hook up the front lighting please. a simple strand of LED lights at the front of the stage would do wonders. i have blue ones around my bar that light up my whole room.

wiredchicken · « **Reply #22 on:** February 08, 2006, 12:22:02 pm »

is this song being made a big deal because it was brought off the shelf? cause to me, it def doesnt not get the job done. why unshelve this song i guess is what i am getting at. does nothing for me and after listening to the show, is one of the lower points musically on the discs.

just my .02 flame away if you want to.

leith · « **Reply #23 on:** February 08, 2006, 01:31:24 pm »

Quote from: derickw

Ellis, hook up the front lighting please. a simple strand of LED lights at the front of the stage would do wonders. i have blue ones around my bar that light up my whole room.

No the problem is not that he does not HAVE the front lighting. He does.
He just does not know how to use conventionals ALONG w/ his movers.
It has always been a problem for him since The Puppethouse and if he has not gotten a clue yet, I doubt he will. :sigh:

Quote from: wiredchicken

is this song being made a big deal because it was brought off the shelf? cause to me, it def doesnt not get the job done. why unshelve this song i guess is what i am getting at. does nothing for me and after listening to the show, is one of the lower points musically on the discs.

just my .02 flame away if you want to.

Yes that is the only reason.
I also do not think it\'s all that, but it is nice to have them bring back a song old school fans like and that they can reinterpet as The Breakfast.

Overexjoesure · « **Reply #24 on:** February 08, 2006, 01:35:38 pm »

I feel a shitstorm coming on soon...

wiredchicken · « **Reply #25 on:** February 08, 2006, 01:41:05 pm »

because of what i said, TreyChica? i mean, i can see the old PBers diggin on it since its been retired for so long, but would they want to hear it everyother show? i certainly wouldnt......

as far a those ballad type songs go, i would rather hear Good Things.

Overexjoesure · « **Reply #26 on:** February 08, 2006, 01:45:00 pm »

No, It has nothing to do with what you said (coughLEITHcough). To each his own. You just need to sink into "Love Lake", I\'m sure if they keep on playing it eventually it will own your face. Because my dear friend, "Love Lake" in fact is a sick jam launcher......

wiredchicken · « **Reply #27 on:** February 08, 2006, 01:49:57 pm »

eitherway, i def think "Epic" was the wrong choice of words.....

Overexjoesure · « **Reply #28 on:** February 08, 2006, 01:52:00 pm »

You havent swam in the Love Lake yet......

Igziabeher · « **Reply #29 on:** February 08, 2006, 01:53:54 pm »

yeah, i gotta go w/ colin on this one. Epic is a drastic overstatement. I\'d use that term for Buquebus or Rufus, but Love Lake? I dunno about that. I\'d rather them bring back Kote, which I wouldn\'t call epic either, but I have more fun w/ that tune. Gypsy Girl, I can do w/o.

News:

Author Topic: New Love Lake is Epic!!! (Read 4351 times)