:sadban:
dave et all - the callndar is very easy to read. there are 5 numbers, each seperated by a period. Compair it to our calendar. We have month/day/year (at least in the US
). In our calendar, after december (12), we cycle back to january (1) as the beginging of the first column \'month\'. Mayan works the same way, only the numbers are different:
The kin, tun, and katun are numbered from 0 to 19.
The uinal are numbered from 0 to 17.
The baktun are numbered from 1 to 13
So, if 10/28/2011 is the day the world ends, that means that it is the \'roll over\' of the calendar, where every number turns back into a zero (0.0.0.0.0) Just like in a odometer, that means that 10/27/2011 would be (13.19.19.17.19) since these are the highest numbers for each column.
an equivelent date in our calendar would be 12/31/99999999999~ (if our year column ever rolled over)
note: technically, the date it rolled over might be 1.0.0.0.0. This is because the baktun is number 1-13, where all others start with 0. This is one of the reason there are debated start dates on the calendar. If it started with 0 and not 1, then the start day would be off by 394 years.
more info:
http://webexhibits.org/calendars/calendar-mayan.htmlno its very different. y2k was the product of us taking shortcuts on our technology, and then panicking, "OH NO WE SCREWED OURSELVES, THE WORLD WILL END!!!" the mayan calendar charts the evolution of human consciousness in a way that shows complex cyclical, rhythmic patterns as to how the human mind has and will evolve.
you miss understood me. I wasnt compairing the even, I was compairing the human responce to the event. Both are concidered to be \'days the world will end\'. Whenever something like that is suppose to happen, the news ignores it untill right before, then jumps on it and covers it non-stop for weeks on end. That was the compairison I was making.