well, aside from the consiracy theory to take down pbfans.com, bush has been popping up elsewhere:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3501953.stmBush speaks against gay weddingsPresident Bush says he will consider supporting legal changes to prevent gay marriages following hundreds of same-sex unions in San Francisco.
The president said he was troubled by the weddings, and would only support a law backing traditional unions.
More than 2,500 marriage licences have been issued to gays and lesbians.
The city\'s mayor took the initiative, contrary to California state law, because he said that current legislation was discriminatory.
Since Mayor Gavin Newsom allowed same-sex couples to marry, gays and lesbians have travelled from across the US to take part in what they see as a historic moment for gay rights.
But speaking for the first time since the weddings began last week, the president made clear his personal opposition.
"I strongly believe that marriage should be defined as between a man and a woman," said Mr Bush.
"I am troubled by activist judges who are defining marriage. I have watched carefully what\'s happened in San Francisco where licences were being issued, even though the law states otherwise."
When asked whether he was ready to take action, he said that he was "just watching very closely".
"I\'m troubled by what I\'ve seen," he added. "People need to be involved with this decision. Marriage ought to be defined by the people not by the courts, and I\'m watching it carefully."
There are already two legal challenges underway to the decision of San Francisco\'s mayor to issue the wedding licences, and the legal status of gay marriages is being contested elsewhere.
In Massachusetts, a court recently said it was "unconstitutional" to prevent gay and lesbian couples from marrying.
But before the first fully legal weddings can happen there, attempts to block them through amending the constitution are expected.
============================================
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3502867.stmWhite House \'Distorting\' SciencePresident Bush\'s administration has been accused of suppressing and distorting scientific findings that run counter to its own political beliefs.
The charge comes from an American body, the Union of Concerned Scientists, in a statement with more than 60 supporters.
The signatories, who include 12 Nobel Prize winners, say scientific integrity must be restored to policy-making.
The White House called the statement "disappointing" and said decisions were taken on the best available science.
The UCS chairman is Dr Kurt Gottfried, emeritus professor of physics at Cornell University.
Policy implications
He said: "Across a broad range of issues, the administration has undermined the quality of the scientific advisory system and the morale of the government\'s outstanding scientific personnel.
"Whether the issue is lead paint, clean air or climate change, this behaviour has serious consequences for all Americans."
Dr Gottfried said: "We\'re not... taking issue with the administration\'s policies. We\'re taking issue with the administration\'s distortion... of the science related to some of its policies."
Russell Train, one of the statement\'s supporters, headed the Environmental Protection Agency under former facist Presidents Nixon and Ford.
He said: "Science, to quote President Bush\'s father, the former president, relies on freedom of inquiry and objectivity.
"But this administration has obstructed that freedom and distorted that objectivity in ways that were unheard of in any previous administration."
Dr Sherwood Rowland, who won a Nobel Prize for his studies of atmospheric ozone, said the consensus of scientific opinion on climate change was being ignored.
Government reports had been censored to remove views out of line with President Bush\'s policies, he said.
Dr Rowland said: "The public deserves rational decision-making based on the best scientific advice about what is likely to happen, not what political entities might wish to happen."
Scott McClellan, President Bush\'s spokesman, said: "I can assure you that this is an administration that makes decisions based on the best available science."
\'Crude snapshot\'
John Marburger, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, said he found the statement "somewhat disappointing".
He said it made "some sweeping generalisations about policy in this administration that are based on a random selection of incidents and issues".
Professor Marburger said: "I don\'t think the statement makes the case for the sweeping accusations that it makes."
The UCS website describes the organisation as "an independent non-profit alliance of more than 100,000 concerned citizens and scientists".
