you guys just want to argue for the sake of arguing instead of debate to learn from other peoples mistakes.
True. Keeps the flame burning though. But since you\'re a good bit of the reason why I entertain myself arguing aimlessly among friends on this forum, and why I have many of these friends to begin with, I\'ll quit fucking around and entertain a shift towards remotely intellectual debate.
There are many layers of right and wrong.
Was Kayne mean to Taylor Swift and hurt her feelings? Yes and yes.
Was it a dick move on his part? Totally.
Did he embrace his emotions passionately and live in the moment to do so? Yes.
Is that a bad thing? Usually not, but in some cases can lead to reckless behavior.
Did the universe get a chuckle out of the whole ordeal compared to almost any issue which trumps this in importance? I certainly hope so. I did.
Was it wrong for me to laugh? Maybe, see below.
Did I laugh at Taylor Swift\'s hurt feelings? No, I felt sort of bad for her. Even though I tend to feel less bad for the rich and famous because they can always go be rich and famous even if something shitty happens.
Did I laugh at Kayne West\'s insanely ballsy, cocky, and over-the-top behavior and the general public\'s reaction to it? Oh yeah!
Zoom in / zoom out, and there you find different dimensions where there may be some flexibility within the universal laws of right and wrong. Love is universally good in any dimension. Passion and laughter are usually connected to love and are therefore usually inherently good also. Misdirected passion due to cockiness that verges on insanity leading to laughter and general amusement at the fact that somebody broke social norms and helped bring about a discussion on the many true natures of humanity... well I think the world is a better place overall with a little bit of that from time to time.
peace. Going back to see what other posts I slightly disagree with or maybe even really do agree with but feel like disagreeing anyway
