whoever thinks that doing 6-8 weeks on the road opening for a larger act is not a good idea is absolutely clown shoes!
Really? Alright Jim Cobb, let’s get it on
I’ll make the case against “doing 6-8 weeks on the road opening for a larger act” and you make the case for it.
(The point isn’t to see who wins
it’s just to prove that this is a complex issue and nobody is “absolute clown shoes” for being on either side.)
Here we go…
Two months on the road without headlining a show? Playing 45 minutes a night for 25 shows? That’s a solid quarter or more of the year’s touring schedule without any serious musical accomplishment. How is the band supposed to get any momentum going playing 5 songs a night? Matt and the new bass player might even forget how to play the tunes. And would we ever see anything like the Middle East/Toad’s/Electric Company run of serness? All that touring and not a single epic set II or encore to show for it. If you’re in a band, you’d have to hate that. I don’t want the guys to go on a tour that they wouldn’t like playing.
How about money? Opening acts get chump change. The band doesn’t need to be driven broke to pick up a couple more fans. They do well enough on their own.
Do we really know for sure that fans of these types of bands even like opening acts? A lot of big bands that The Breakfast might open for almost never have openers. Their fans expect a full night every time. Some will like it. Some won’t. Some won’t care and will show up late or drink in the back.
Would The Breakfast really make more fans doing 6-8 weeks on the road opening for a larger act than they would on their own? I’m not sure. What I am sure of is that they would play a lot less music, build a lot less momentum, and make a lot less money. There are better ways to not headline. Festivals? Absolutely. Late-night afterparties for bigger bands? Yes, please. Opening act? Not worth it.
You\'re up Jim.