your so worried about being "all biscuit like" your hatin on something that could potentially be really sick.
it\'s not about gettin all psyched out on the fact that they did it, it\'s the interesting jams and segues that lead from one song to another. it\'s comes out different when its middle one song->ending other song than it does when it middle one song->start of another or end of one song ->beginning of another.
bah blah but It\'s just another way to mix things up. bfast has a lot of multi part songs too they could really mix it up when matt knows everything and they put some time into writing the lists.
If they can pull off lawnboy without people being haters they can pull off doing crazy set list inversion/dyslexic stuff without the hatin too because it will be too nasty for hatin. If anyone truly doesn\'t want to be a fan because they get jiggy with it, oh well, sucks for them.
No it\'s not hating it\'s being realistic. This band has enough of a problem with people grasping what they do now. As I posted every once in awhile something like this would be sick I understand the potential for sickness.
The Breakfast do what they do well. They come up with interesting segues just fine.
Why ask them to change the basic formula of what has got them here to copy another band\'s way of playing a show?
It does not make sense.
Oh and just because the biscuits make it sound easy it is not and I would rather The Breakfast spend time honing their own style than copying someone else\'s.
Lawn Boy was a one shot you are talking about changing the way the band plays a set.
