Quote from: jking;144302if its such a good show and there are a bunch of sources, why are they realeasing it in the worst possible format??? no lossless?? 192kbps MP3s instead?? i mean seriously, its like they want it to sound as bad as possible. not slamming them or the show, but i am thoroughly confused why they\'d release it like that?? personally, if i\'m gonna buy a show, i\'m sure as hell not gonna buy discs that\'re the equivalent of third gen aud tapes, ya know?!It\'s called trying out a new method of selling their music on myspace. Pretty bummed but if this is the only way I\'m getting this show then so be it. It is a revenue generator plain and simple.
if its such a good show and there are a bunch of sources, why are they realeasing it in the worst possible format??? no lossless?? 192kbps MP3s instead?? i mean seriously, its like they want it to sound as bad as possible. not slamming them or the show, but i am thoroughly confused why they\'d release it like that?? personally, if i\'m gonna buy a show, i\'m sure as hell not gonna buy discs that\'re the equivalent of third gen aud tapes, ya know?!
I know you probably will not listen to any of it but you really would be doing yourself wrong. That cd is pretty kick ass.
sure, i get that. but why not release it in 320kbps?? 192 obviously sounds like an mp3, especially in the cymbals and other high end frequencies. its not gonna cost them any more money to encode it that way (or higher) and they could reasonably even charge a little more for it.
see, if i had dan healy on the board, i wouldn\'t want to release that as anything other than flac, with maybe a 320 for the n00bs who don\'t know anybetter. but to only offer 192 healy mix seems like buying a picasso, then hanging wax paper over it for viewing...what does it matter, i\'m only gonna oink it if i bother at all... :evil:
