So Google chrome is good because::
> Fast
> Each tab is a different process rather than a thread, ie, less browser crashing
And sucks because:::
> Not extensible like Firefox
> Not open source (though it uses an open source rendering engine)
I choose to stick with and support the Mozilla project. IMO Google Chrome\'s only advantage so far is a supposed 20% speed increase that I can\'t detect through normal use.
It is speculated that Google introduced Chrome to keep javascript/ajax as a primary component of web development--- even though these technologies are sort of getting tired. This benefits Google because the way Google and other search engines have their robots now, Flash is not index-able. Nor is the horrid proprietary technology "Silverlight" which Microsoft is trying to get everyone to use now.
In short. I use Linux. Open source software and community development allows me to do everything I want in an incredibly flexible, stable, and aesthetic user environment -- and do it legally for free. Mozilla is a huge asset to open source computing and, with all the community built extensions out there, it\'s still the best browser.
But, if Google\'s move slows the adoption of Microsoft Silverlight, as a web developer first, and as a Linux PC user second, I\'ll all for it.