Author Topic: Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?  (Read 35131 times)

tyzack

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2153
    • http://
Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #90 on: February 27, 2008, 11:57:52 am »
It would seem as though "invenitable" candidates are not doing very well this year.

A year ago, it "looked" like Hillary/Guiliani...but that hasn\'t panned out.

The point on ratings is a great one.

I like brocli.
Apartheid: A policy of segregation and political and economic discrimination.

siflandollie

  • Victory to RAGE
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #91 on: February 27, 2008, 12:24:00 pm »

Gordo

  • Nicky Cheesecake
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3260
    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=515917765
Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #92 on: February 27, 2008, 01:12:45 pm »
I\'ve avoided this thread because it\'d be too time/energy consuming. Now that it seems fairly certain that we\'re looking at McCain vs. Obama, hopefully Obama will be the last man standing. I fear McCain because of our current situation and his history/family tree that gives credit to the idea that being in a war is a natural state.

Of course there are question marks with Obama, but after having trouble formulating a solid opinion on him for over a year now, I\'ve decided that I do in fact like him and where he stands on most issues and he will get my confident vote.

Of course his VP running mate will be interesting and important, and I\'ll cross my fingers for Joe Biden (although many say he\'s a possibility but not likely). I\'ve been a Biden supporter for awhile, if he ran with Obama he\'d give him the experience that everyone fears that he lacks, especially with his foreign affairs resume. (< <  anyone know how to get tildes and accents above the letter desired? I\'ve struggled with this since I was a nin~o)
The crickets and the rust-beetles scuttled among the nettles of the sagethicket. "Vamanos amigos," he whispered, and threw the busted leather flintscraw over the loose weave of the saddlecock. And they rode on in the friscalating dusklight.  --Eli Cash

Gfunk

  • Papa^
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3733
    • http://www.myspace.com/weaksauce603
Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #93 on: February 27, 2008, 01:56:36 pm »
What the canidates were really saying in last nights debate: http://moonshinepatriot.blogspot.com/2008/02/facistic-debate-msnbc-february-26.html
Quote
Williams: This debate is like a facist bathhouse - the only rule is that there are no rules!
« Last Edit: February 27, 2008, 02:45:18 pm by Gfunk »
Facial Hair Would Be So Nice

Klout

  • Ser Face Tunage
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4310
    • http://www.myspace.com/klout
Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #94 on: February 27, 2008, 02:01:07 pm »
i watched the highlights on cnn.com. thank god Hillary will be stepping aside soon.  I can\'t take anymore of her.

ds673488

  • Fair Weather Fan
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3506
Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #95 on: February 27, 2008, 02:20:41 pm »
i heard monica lewenski announced she is joining the race
DS Newbers

ChrisPitch

  • Hell of a Life
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1599
    • http://
Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #96 on: February 27, 2008, 02:46:12 pm »
That\'s great. She\'ll blow the rest of the field away.

ds673488

  • Fair Weather Fan
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3506
Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #97 on: February 27, 2008, 02:59:14 pm »
Quote from: ChrisPitch;181643
That\'s great. She\'ll blow the rest of the field away.


rotfl:rotfl:rotfl:rotfl:rotfl:rotfl:
DS Newbers

jking

  • thanks!!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
    • http://
Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #98 on: February 27, 2008, 03:09:24 pm »
not taking sides here, just noting...

There\'s an Obama Nation upon us

is a pretty close homophone to

There\'s an Abomination upon us.

just sayin\'....

[/evil]

SkyePrizm

  • separator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2368
Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #99 on: February 27, 2008, 04:31:48 pm »
this is all i have to say.

http://www.youtube.com/v/wKsoXHYICqU&rel=1">http://www.youtube.com/v/wKsoXHYICqU&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355">

bdfreetuna

  • Team Gladys
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4586
Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #100 on: February 27, 2008, 04:59:38 pm »
1. Tim Russert = still a major league asshole

2. HRC won the debate according to Guardian.uk ?? Must not have been the same debate I was watching.

3. Russert + NBC did appear to be trying to put the final nail in Hillary\'s coffin. I\'m not a Hillary fan but this was disgustingly transparent and not professional.
Put the pointed pencil in the pepper-po and take a little sniff of the things below. :sadban:

> > > forums.alpinezone.com > > > Pelland Advertising

ChrisPitch

  • Hell of a Life
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1599
    • http://
Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #101 on: February 27, 2008, 05:08:09 pm »
I don\'t think guardian was suggesting that Hillary won the debate. I think they were basically saying that she pulled out all the stops to try and win the debate, which not surprisingly, failed to work.

ChrisPitch

  • Hell of a Life
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1599
    • http://
Nader picks Gonzalez as running mate
« Reply #102 on: February 28, 2008, 05:00:50 pm »
I know that this may be a mix of "who?" vs. "who cares?", but hey, news is news. And after all, someone has to report the developments related to the non-Republi-Crats.



Daniel Nasaw, guardian.co.uk

Presidential candidate Ralph Nader chose a San Francisco politician as his pick for running mate this year as he selected  Matt Gonzalez, former president of the San Francisco board of supervisors, who Nader says shares his vision of an America rid of corporate influence in politics.

"I found him to be unwavering in his principles and committed to his politics with clear eloquence and humane logic," Nader said. "I wanted someone who served in government and who knows what kind of challenges our cities face and who has a record of accomplishment in areas such as election reform, criminal justice, and the creation of the highest minimum wage in the country."

Nader, 74, is a consumer advocate credited with helping popularize automobile seatbelts and airbags and also for standing up for consumers against corporations, initially through his group Public Citizen. He was instrumental in the founding of government agencies that protect citizens from corporate environmental pollution and workers from unsafe working conditions.

Nader\'s entry into the race has provoked disdain from the facists he accuses of being too soft on corporate power.

Hillary Clinton said, "it\'s not good for anybody, especially our country."

Obama was more charitable, saying "Ralph Nader deserves enormous credit for the work he did as a consumer advocate. But his function as a perennial candidate is not putting food on the table of workers."


And while I\'m at it...


Bloomberg decides against presidential run



Ewen MacAskill, guardian.co.uk

New York mayor Michael Bloomberg opened a bidding war between presidential candidates for his support after finally opting against an independent run for the White House.

Making his announcement in the New York Times, the multi-billionaire dangled the prospect of his backing in return for policy pledges from the candidate that comes closest to his own views.

Bloomberg wrote: "I listened carefully to those who encouraged me to run, but I am not — and will not be — a candidate for president … I am hopeful that the current campaigns can rise to the challenge by offering truly independent leadership.

"The most productive role that I can serve is to push them forward, by using the means at my disposal to promote a real and honest debate."

Bloomberg added he would help the candidate prepared to buck party orthodoxy: "If a candidate takes an independent, nonpartisan approach — and embraces practical solutions that challenge party orthodoxy — I\'ll join others in helping that candidate win the White House."

Bloomberg, who was facist, then facist, and is now an independent, was more likely to have stood if the candidates were polarizing figures, allowing him to appeal to independents.

But John McCain, who is close to winning the facist nomination, has a strong appeal to independents, and so too does Barack Obama, who\'s still fighting Hillary Clinton for the facistic nomination.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2008, 05:02:19 pm by ChrisPitch »

sallyalli

  • NewHampshire Fordamnsure
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1304
Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #103 on: February 29, 2008, 02:05:00 pm »
man, I just started looking at voting histories and views on the issues of the candidates. I gotta tell you, mccain seems to be the devil.
:banguitar: :banboogy2:

ChrisPitch

  • Hell of a Life
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1599
    • http://
Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #104 on: February 29, 2008, 03:47:20 pm »
Hey, way to stay informed. That\'s one of the reasons why I keep posting these news items. I\'m hoping it will prompt people to dive in to the actual issues and not just focus on the political pissing contest. Good for you.