Who does it for you more between these reggae icons. I will save my comment for a while, but I will vote for Tosh. Let\'s discuss.
Tosh is a much, much better guitarist but he can\'t write songs like ol\' Bob. Bob\'s got the voice, the lyrics and was not as militant as Tosh. Bob first, Tosh second and Bunny third for good measure. btw good topic and better quote walsh, hands down fav writer
The whole point of reggae is to be militant...it is protest music. But good points...I really am interested in everyone\'s take on this.
i think i have been overexposed to bob
i have not enough knowledge of tosh\'s work
i like them both, but would have to choose bob with my limited information
whoa is there even a contest???
bob all the way.
so many amazing & soulful songs, i never get tired of them.
I have to Bob but thats only out of the ignorance I have with reggae music. I don\'t think I have listened to enough Peter Tosh to vote against him, so I\'m going with, "Sorry...I don\'t smoke."
Tosh all the way. I love his version of Johnny B. Goode, he just had a more rock and roll approach to reggae that i dig. I\'ll throw up a disc on sendspace later on today.
Igziabeher...hmmm? I was wondering who you would pick;) I definitely like Marley, don\'t get me wrong but to me Peter Tosh is what reggae should sound like, even his "rockish"-type of songs are still roots-reggae in message...I love his voice too. Plus he wrote "Get Up, Stand Up" AND "Legalize It"...\'nuff said.
tosh motherfuckers --- wanted dead and alive, bush doctor, no nuclear war, mama africa, legalize it, all classics. I cant get enough of tosh
**** genius
Neither is better. W/O each other we would not even know who they were.
Tosh was a political voice and stood by his convictions.
It came through his music just as clearly as the peaceful stylings of Marley.
Thing is people like to be happy and ignore the bad things in life so One Love was easier to groove to than Stepping Razor.
I\'m not gonna vote, since I don\'t see Jimmy Cliff on the poll & I do smoke
Good point Leith, but you do know of both of them so stop being a douche and answer the question;)
I hear you though, but I feel your reasoning is flawed...it was the American music industry trying to bring this form of music to america that let us know who "they are". Marley was obviously more marketable, because of the positivity in his songs, but that isn\'t what the true spirit of reggae was all about. Most of what we got to hear from Marley was american-bastardizations of great roots-reggae. They set Marley up with extra session players(american) that could give more of an "appeal" to the music.
Marley went along because he felt if his message could get out to the world(even if it was softened), it would bring a chance for peace. Tosh "Didn\'t want peace, [he] wanted justice". He didn\'t want his songs of protest and anti-oppression commercialized for capitalist consumption. That was 100% against what he believed in. The classic One Love Peace Concert shows this Marley/Tosh juxtaposition the best. Tosh came out spitting FIRE and talking against every perceived injustice in Jamaica...including DEMANDING that the farmers be allowed to grow marijuana and, that rastafarians be allowed to smoke freely as their system of beliefs called for. With the crowd in an uproar he spoke after nearly EVERY song against the very Goverment officials that were IN ATTENDANCE.
THEN, Marley comes out and gets the two govt heads that were basically at war to shake hands. I read once that after that Marley was quoted as saying that he should have,"Put a bullet in both of their heads". Yet Marley\'s fame as an "ambassador" was out there for everyone in america to get behind, because as you said...people like their political messages safe and acceptable, not brash and possibly controversial.
interesting information Walsh.
I know nothing, NOTHING, about reggae.