thebreakfast.info

Breakfast Babble => The Grand Scheme Of Things => Topic started by: leith on March 26, 2007, 09:56:37 pm


Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: rcoster38 on April 03, 2007, 10:32:31 am
doozie = reference to the duesenberg luxury cars of the early 20th century (originally duesy),

meaning something grand and luxurious
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: jocelyn on April 02, 2007, 07:27:42 pm
Quote from: siflandollie;140963

I was also trippen balls, and there was a giant inflatable obstacle course

woooo! I always wanted to be a gerbil!
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: siflandollie on April 02, 2007, 06:15:24 pm
Quote from: derickw;140257
let the tapes show and the listeners determine for themselves if it was a dooz or not

I\'m pretty sure that would leave most of us thinking the breakfast keep playing sold-out shows.

i\'ve seen some doozies, and they have been very interesting to say the least.  Over a year ago the band played at the "sons of leo harvest festival for hurricane katrina" at **** 11 in the morning.  Needless to say there were not many people there, really just me and my buddies, the people running the festie, and whichever peoples came down with the band.  
That being said, they absolutely blew my mind by noon.  And I have never had a band blow my mind that early in the day.

I was also trippen balls, and there was a giant inflatable obstacle course
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: Blackieshamps on March 27, 2007, 08:46:40 pm
Quote from: Jim Cobb;140194
2/11/05 - The Loft, Poughkeepsie, NY = textbook dooze.  maybe 10 people.  wah, me!, 3 of my friends and i, blackieshamps and a couple friends of his.

we took four cars to that show, so there had to be more than a couple friends of mine. not my fault poughkeepsies too disgusting for normal, decent people to go to.
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: delfunk1 on March 27, 2007, 06:05:15 pm
I think people join dot info after already seeing the band and digging them.  So I think they already have their opinion of the band and won\'t be skewed too much by reading these doozie posts.
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: bdfreetuna on March 27, 2007, 05:08:21 pm
Quote from: alexanderzurflu;140259
Yeah, let\'s turn back the clock several hundred years and spend most of the daylight hours hunting/gathering/farming food!

Right on!

Leith don\'t worry about noobs seeing how we always say a show is a doozie and thinking WTF is up with these guys they have no fans???

Remember the .info definition of doozie is ass-backwards, any noobs who see it will think the show was sold out!
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: skalnbyc on March 27, 2007, 03:44:59 pm
Quote from: leith;140236
We are not meant to be on this earth trapped in cubicles

Yeah, let\'s turn back the clock several hundred years and spend most of the daylight hours hunting/gathering/farming food!

Quote from: peaches626;140247
i feel like a lot of people on the board like to know how big the crowd was.... ::

:wave:
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: derickw on March 27, 2007, 03:30:13 pm
Quote from: peaches626;140247
i feel like a lot of people on the board like to know how big the crowd was.... ::shrug::

because we always hope there were 100\'s of people there

ok from now on, no one says anything about the crowd size, let the tapes show and the listeners determine for themselves if it was a dooz or not
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: peaches626 on March 27, 2007, 02:23:55 pm
Quote from: leith;140230
Yeah distance gives one a different perspective on things.

How about not describing doozies at all and only remark on the crowd was digging it. We all know The Breakfast do not draw but pounding it in every review may not be the best thing.

New people coming on the board that read doozie after doozie may not want to waste the time as many folk go out to party as much as listen to a band and a doozie is not the best place to get one\'s party on.

Just think about it w/o getting all uptight and you will see I am not being an ass(this time).

i feel like a lot of people on the board like to know how big the crowd was.... ::shrug::
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: Jim Cobb on March 27, 2007, 02:15:06 pm
Quote from: booztravlr;140240
i disagree. if im going to a concert (any band) in \'party mode\' i doubt seeing a show that isn\'t filled to capacity is going to affect that. im going there to see live music and enjoy myself. ill have plenty of room to dance around and there will be little to no lines at the bar, meaning i can booz as hard as i want.

i am reminded of the rochester show from last november. i brought 5 first timers with me but that place was pretty empty. we all had a good time hanging out, taking shots, slamming beers and getting real close to the stage without losing the party aspect nor the concert aspect. the band played their asses off and even took a request (i\'m the slime) from the small crowd that had been so attentive all night. if people are going to see a show for the first time i think a smaller crowd would be more ideal. itll allow them to focus on the music more but will also allow them to roam the bar and take in the whole scene, not worry about some drunk next to you bumping elbows all night because its packed.


apparently you\'re in the minority with this mindset, hence the doozies.
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: booztravlr on March 27, 2007, 01:53:31 pm
Quote from: leith;140230
New people coming on the board that read doozie after doozie may not want to waste the time as many folk go out to party as much as listen to a band and a doozie is not the best place to get one\'s party on.

i disagree. if im going to a concert (any band) in \'party mode\' i doubt seeing a show that isn\'t filled to capacity is going to affect that. im going there to see live music and enjoy myself. ill have plenty of room to dance around and there will be little to no lines at the bar, meaning i can booz as hard as i want.

i am reminded of the rochester show from last november. i brought 5 first timers with me but that place was pretty empty. we all had a good time hanging out, taking shots, slamming beers and getting real close to the stage without losing the party aspect nor the concert aspect. the band played their asses off and even took a request (i\'m the slime) from the small crowd that had been so attentive all night. if people are going to see a show for the first time i think a smaller crowd would be more ideal. itll allow them to focus on the music more but will also allow them to roam the bar and take in the whole scene, not worry about some drunk next to you bumping elbows all night because its packed.
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: leith on March 27, 2007, 01:39:18 pm
Quote from: Stephengencs;140233
I hear ya leith....
I am a bit jumpy as I am bound to a desk and computer right now.....
Working a temp job at my dad\'s office.....
enough work at a decient wage, but its starting to drive me bonkers.....

No worries man. We are not meant to be on this earth trapped in cubicles made by Man when we are all trapped in our own cubicles called our minds so I can get the jumpiness.

Sometimes I post really to get answers and hopefully the person answering was made to think about my question in a way I had not and can lend more light to a subject than I can muster.

Sometimes the question seems made to provoke anger when it is just meant to provoke thought.
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: Stephengencs on March 27, 2007, 01:21:25 pm
I hear ya leith....
I am a bit jumpy as I am bound to a desk and computer right now.....
Working a temp job at my dad\'s office.....
enough work at a decient wage, but its starting to drive me bonkers.....
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: Gfunk on March 27, 2007, 01:14:55 pm
Quote from: leith;140223
It seems to me on a fansite for this band that it can be assumed the guys raged it and I would think that the opposite would be more worthy of noting.

ok, so let me get this straight, on the fansite we should only talk about the negative aspect of what went down?
Edit: that was before i read your last post leith
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: leith on March 27, 2007, 01:13:52 pm
Quote from: Stephengencs;140225
Thank you captain obvious........  I mean we really needed you to point out that there was low attendance at the show and other breakfast doozies.....  And part of the fact that we have a new manager and we are currently in the process of devising a new grassroots structure, is to stop the doozies.......but thanks again for pointing that out to us.....You are on point from even 3000 miles away......

Yeah distance gives one a different perspective on things.

How about not describing doozies at all and only remark on the crowd was digging it. We all know The Breakfast do not draw but pounding it in every review may not be the best thing.

New people coming on the board that read doozie after doozie may not want to waste the time as many folk go out to party as much as listen to a band and a doozie is not the best place to get one\'s party on.

Just think about it w/o getting all uptight and you will see I am not being an ass(this time).
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: Stephengencs on March 27, 2007, 12:57:54 pm
Thank you captain obvious........  I mean we really needed you to point out that there was low attendance at the show and other breakfast doozies.....  And part of the fact that we have a new manager and we are currently in the process of devising a new grassroots structure, is to stop the doozies.......but thanks again for pointing that out to us.....You are on point from even 3000 miles away......
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: leith on March 27, 2007, 12:53:51 pm
Quote from: Drew_Kingsley;140140
My take is that "but the people there were getting down" is an attempt to stay optimistic.  And it\'s not a bad sign completely.  At least, not as bad as the occasions when the entire crowd is listed by first name on the forum the next day.

Thank You Drew for being the only one to attempt to answer my question.

Yeah that is what i was thinking also. It just seems like it can be construed as trying to "cover" for the poor attendence and has become somewhat habit in show reviews.

As in no one showed up but it was not The Breakfast\'s fault, they played their asses off even with no one there.

Well isn\'t that what a band paid to play does if they are even close to being professional?

It seems to me on a fansite for this band that it can be assumed the guys raged it and I would think that the opposite would be more worthy of noting.

It also seems to me that in keeping up with this type of thinking "doozies are OK as long as the people there are rocking" only lends to the perception that this is a bar band not a Touring National Act.

Quote from: DocEllis70;140183
what are you wondering?

Can\'t read?
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: Jim Cobb on March 27, 2007, 11:51:30 am
i also watched a police pursuit outside the club in which the car being pursued crashed into another cop car and a cop smashed the dude\'s driver side window with his gun and dragged the guy out of the car.



oh and i received several offers for crack that night.
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: Stephengencs on March 27, 2007, 11:50:35 am
Leith,  your post makes no sense to me....
I dont understand where you are coming from or what point you are trying to make.....
Breakfast doozies are described the same way, because they usually go down the same way....are you trying to say anything pertinant or just trying to make me look/sound stupid?

However the Paugkeepsie doozie was probably the toughest breakfast dooize I have ever seen.  The room was filled with smoke that stunk of hamburger grease and dirty frying oil....

The harrisburg doozie was only less tough because Gabe was rockin harder than the entire room was, and that was just great to see........
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: Mamalakabubadaya on March 27, 2007, 11:29:28 am
oh yeah..that place was great. they searched my purse twice and followed me into the bathroom. there was a 24-hour barber shop across the street. really awesome!~!!!!
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: Jim Cobb on March 27, 2007, 11:25:05 am
ahh yes, i knew i was forgetting a bunch
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: davepeck on March 27, 2007, 10:56:05 am
Quote from: Jim Cobb;140194
2/11/05 - The Loft, Poughkeepsie, NY = textbook dooze.  maybe 10 people.  wah, me!, 3 of my friends and i, blackieshamps and a couple friends of his.

...me, lisa, mike, stevie, lisa trey, holly.....
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: Buquebus on March 27, 2007, 10:49:34 am
^^^yah jim, but we got a Sundance>Bugs>Sundance.....  
as stated earlier, the band still plays as if the room were packed, which is part of the reasons I have found so much respect for these folks..

9/27/06 harrisburg PA Abbey Bar appalachian brewing co..
saddest way to kick off a tour/cd release, made ron spears reference suicide
  harrisburg + wed. night= d00zefest
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: Jim Cobb on March 27, 2007, 10:43:28 am
2/11/05 - The Loft, Poughkeepsie, NY = textbook dooze.  maybe 10 people.  wah, me!, 3 of my friends and i, blackieshamps and a couple friends of his.
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: FreeSpirit on March 27, 2007, 10:40:12 am
I\'ve seen the band & fans call many shows a dooze, but I think the word itself is just overused.  Sure, they might not draw a huge crowd at every show, but if there are 30-40 NEW heads in the crowd, it shouldn\'t qualify as a dooze.  IMO, even a show with only 20 people shouldn\'t be a dooze.  Hopefully, each of those people will like it & tell a few friends. :shrug:
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: derickw on March 27, 2007, 09:45:13 am
i always have a great time at Breakfast shows but it\'s the crowd that makes or breaks a doozie. i\'ve seen the guys fired up and not so fired up before a show but they never fail to deliver in either instance.
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: DocEllis70 on March 27, 2007, 09:26:17 am
Quote from: leith;140139
Just wondering.

what are you wondering?
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: Whathefunk on March 26, 2007, 10:23:38 pm
all i have to say is that the first bfast show i went to was not what you would consider a doozie and i thought the band rocked and all, but the second one i went to months later, was a def dooze.  but a big reason why i was soo impressed by the band was the fact that they played with ten times the emotion, feeling, and soul than the first show i went to with less than half the heads there.  That was what sold me on this band, that they evoked the same feelings I had felt from seeing a show played to 30,000 people being played to 30. I think its a special thing to see a dooze, though they obv deserve much better.
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: Drew_Kingsley on March 26, 2007, 09:59:00 pm
My take is that "but the people there were getting down" is an attempt to stay optimistic.  And it\'s not a bad sign completely.  At least, not as bad as the occasions when the entire crowd is listed by first name on the forum the next day.
Title: Why are most Breakfast doozies described the same way?
Post by: leith on March 26, 2007, 09:56:37 pm
Pretty much anytime someone reports on a Breakfast show that is a doozie( low turnout),it is always followed by " but the people that were there were getting down".

Well no **** sherlock, it\'s a Breakfast show.

No one is going to stay at a Breakfast show and not be into it. The Breakfast are too obnoxious (ie very loud) for that. One either likes it and gets down or one does not and leaves.

It is the rare person that can just sit and watch this band(w/o being zonked on mass headies) much less a rarer room where more than a couple people are doing that.

Just wondering.