not a photoshop, check the pic source, straight from the washington post.
That is photoshoped, like any other article in a beauty magazine, nothing is real in that
****, once again don\'t get me wrong I\'m not saying I wouldn\'t but you can\'t take anything from those magazines for the truth
some of us don\'t care for trailer trash, brah!
Spacey, please, like if given the oppurtunity you wouldn\'t tap that......
Spacey, please, like if given the oppurtunity you wouldn\'t tap that......
probably not, shes had 2 kids and I don\'t feel like crawling inside.
I\'d slap that, though.
That is photoshoped, like any other article in a beauty magazine, nothing is real in that ****, once again don\'t get me wrong I\'m not saying I wouldn\'t but you can\'t take anything from those magazines for the truth
There is a difference in inserting an image over another in order to give a certain appearance and airbrushing to accentuate the natural beauty that is there.
In this instance the natural beauty of Britney most def. was accented w/ airbrushing but that is all Britney.
that original pic is not photoshopped
one more time what?
oh by the way, not sure if it\'s been mentioned but i\'m pretty sure that original pic has not been altered.
wait so it wasn\'t photoshopped? :lol:
i dunno, it may have been.
the neck was DEf photoshopped. look at it!
