News:

One fat hen couple duck three brown bear four running hare five fat fickle female sitting sipping scotch six simple simon sitting on a stone seven sinbad sailors sailed the seven seas eight egotistical egoists echoing egotistical ecstasies nine nude nublians nimbly nibbling nuts gnats nicotine ten was and never was a fig plucker nor a fig plucker's son and I ain't leaving till this fucking fig pluckin's done now ask me if I am a turtle. (Tim) Are you a turtle? (Wolf) You bet your sweet ass I'm a turtle. Once a turtle, always a turtle!

Author Topic: Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?  (Read 43398 times)

0 Members and 39 Guests are viewing this topic.

Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #195 on: »
No VP for hillary. But she needs to tell all the brainless women who would have voted for her just because she is a woman to vote for barrack.  Then he can pick a VP who will pull in the blue collar vote and he should be able to beat McCain.

Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #196 on: »
Quote from: Klout;191884
No VP for hillary. But she needs to tell all the brainless women who would have voted for her just because she is a woman to vote for barrack.  Then he can pick a VP who will pull in the blue collar vote and he should be able to beat McCain.

i hope so, i\'m sick of this Republican bullshit and the last thing I want is to get into more **** in other countries with another Republican Warlord
never trouble trouble till trouble troubles you

-. --- .-- / - .... .- - ... / -.. .. -.-. -.-

Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #197 on: »
I get the feeling that it\'s not a smart idea to revive the political thread, but here goes nothing.

An interesting fact: Presumptive Democratic Vice Presidential Candidate Joe Biden sponsored the RAVE Act. That\'s the law that, in part, makes it legal to punish club/bar owners for holding a concert that "promotes drug use".

Now I\'m not saying this makes Obama/Biden worse than the alternative, or that you should vote based upon your ability to smoke a bowl at a Breakfast show, but considering the discussions we had on dotinfo about this law when it was passed, it\'s worth reminding everybody who sponsored it.

(For the record, it was co-sponsored by Chuck Grassley, Orrin Hatch, Joseph Lieberman, Strom Thurmond, Patrick Leahy and Richard Durbin)
Go see your Breakfast, there are starving Leiths in California

Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #198 on: »
Isn\'t Lieberman tight with McCain?

Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #199 on: »
Quote from: Igziabeher;200357
Isn\'t Lieberman tight with McCain?
Lieberman is, as far as I have heard, being discussed as McCain\'s VP for the sole purpose of testing how the general public would react to a Republican candidate with a pro-choice VP.
Go see your Breakfast, there are starving Leiths in California

Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #200 on: »
Quote from: Drew_Kingsley;200356
I get the feeling that it\'s not a smart idea to revive the political thread, but here goes nothing.

An interesting fact: Presumptive Democratic Vice Presidential Candidate Joe Biden sponsored the RAVE Act. That\'s the law that, in part, makes it legal to punish club/bar owners for holding a concert that "promotes drug use".

And this is a bad thing why?
The best music is essentially there to provide you something to face the world with - Bruce Springsteen

Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #201 on: »
Quote from: Yoda;200360
Quote from: Drew_Kingsley;200356
I get the feeling that it\'s not a smart idea to revive the political thread, but here goes nothing.

An interesting fact: Presumptive Democratic Vice Presidential Candidate Joe Biden sponsored the RAVE Act. That\'s the law that, in part, makes it legal to punish club/bar owners for holding a concert that "promotes drug use".

And this is a bad thing why?
When exactly did I call it a "bad thing"? Just throwing it out there as information, since we did discuss the RAVE Act when it was passed.
Go see your Breakfast, there are starving Leiths in California

Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #202 on: »
What I meant is, if anything this is a positive for Biden.
The best music is essentially there to provide you something to face the world with - Bruce Springsteen

Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #203 on: »
So what your first post could have said Yoda, is

"I think that is a positive thing! Joe Biden\'s great! Go Obama!"


Then you wouldn\'t look like a jerk...
taints rule, gypsies drool!

Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #204 on: »
Jeez... I must have really done something to **** you off... It seems like every comment I make, I get a negative response back from you...
The best music is essentially there to provide you something to face the world with - Bruce Springsteen

Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #205 on: »
there should be a "pointless arguing with each other for no reason" thread
DS Newbers

Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #206 on: »
Quote from: ds673488;200408
there should be a "pointless arguing with each other for no reason" thread

Or a forum.. in which case every thread would find itself under at some turn.
The crickets and the rust-beetles scuttled among the nettles of the sagethicket. "Vamanos amigos," he whispered, and threw the busted leather flintscraw over the loose weave of the saddlecock. And they rode on in the friscalating dusklight.  --Eli Cash

Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #207 on: »
McDooze doesn\'t even know how many freakin\' houses he owns. what a joke.






« Last Edit: August 25, 2008, 01:24:41 am by Gfunk »
Facial Hair Would Be So Nice

Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #208 on: »
Yoda, I just feel bad.  You often say things which, on screen, make you look like a jerk. and people get angry and argue with you, and I figure I\'m doin you a favor by lettin you know when your bein a jerk.  Which makes me a jerk.  But at least we both know now.

and i hate bruce springsteen.
taints rule, gypsies drool!

Is there an offical pointless election banter thread anywhere?
« Reply #209 on: »
Maybe I am a jerk, I don\'t know.  Believe it or not, a lot of times, I know that I disagree with the mindset of most of the people on the board, and what I say will make me come across as a jerk.  But if I didn\'t say anything, then what good would this "forum" be?  I still love the music this band puts out, but maybe I\'ve run my course with the fans.  Let\'s try this one out (and I\'m not pointing any fingers at anyone)

- I\'m wrong because I speak out against drug use
- I\'m wrong because I speak out against drunk driving
- I\'m wrong because I don\'t think Synergy is the best thing since sliced cheese
- I\'m wrong because I don\'t want to hear a 30+ minute jam when I see the band
- I\'m wrong because I think Ahoy! is a song

Am I wrong for the band?  Am I not in their demographic anymore?  Maybe so, maybe not.  That has yet to be decided.
The best music is essentially there to provide you something to face the world with - Bruce Springsteen