Internet Archive · archive.org
Date: March 27, 2010
I\'m glad this person taped, my recording wasn\'t nearly as good. Definitely check out set I of this show!
>
Quote from: cannontrip;255345Date: March 27, 2010
I\'m glad this person taped, my recording wasn\'t nearly as good. Definitely check out set I of this show!
>
Nice to see more tapers and uploads to archive as of late. Nice recording and nice rig (as i wipe the drool off my face and shirt) thank you sonicsound who ever you are.
Quote from: mvallo;255346Quote from: cannontrip;255345Date: March 27, 2010
I\'m glad this person taped, my recording wasn\'t nearly as good. Definitely check out set I of this show!
>
Nice to see more tapers and uploads to archive as of late. Nice recording and nice rig (as i wipe the drool off my face and shirt) thank you sonicsound who ever you are.
I just googled the details on the taping rig... that\'s an $11,000 setup :shock2:
We seem to be moving away from 16 bit here. I\'m lost!!!! (sounds great, though!!)
Quote from: Whineberg;255358We seem to be moving away from 16 bit here. I\'m lost!!!! (sounds great, though!!)
yes, most tapers are recording in higher dynamic bit rate and sample rates and uploading these higher quality files to archive. the price of the a high def audio recording and playback systems has dropped considerably. This is a good thing. It just makes it more complicated and more time consuming to burn a CD because on would have to first resample and or dither the files to CD standard 16bit/44.1khz. The reality is the CD is already becoming obsolete, just like cassettes and records. ipods/mp3 players/thumb drives are here to stay.
Quote from: mvallo;255367Quote from: Whineberg;255358We seem to be moving away from 16 bit here. I\'m lost!!!! (sounds great, though!!)
yes, most tapers are recording in higher dynamic bit rate and sample rates and uploading these higher quality files to archive. the price of the a high def audio recording and playback systems has dropped considerably. This is a good thing. It just makes it more complicated and more time consuming to burn a CD because on would have to first resample and or dither the files to CD standard 16bit/44.1khz. The reality is the CD is already becoming obsolete, just like cassettes and records. ipods/mp3 players/thumb drives are here to stay.
I have not had the best of luck trying to resample stuff. I am all for higher resolution recordings but I love cds! I will continue to work at it because the music is just that sick.
Can 24-bit wavs be uploaded to ipods as is?
SourceForge · sox.sourceforge.net
sox.exe -G -r 44100 -b 16 24-bit-input-file.wav 16-bit-output-file.wavThe CD-ROM hasn\'t gone the way of the dodo bird yet. Too many of them installed in people\'s cars.
SoX is easy--and free. There are Windows and Mac binaries--and source code, of course. Very good documentation, too.
http://sox.sourceforge.net/Code: [Select]sox.exe -G -r 44100 -b 16 24-bit-input-file.wav 16-bit-output-file.wav
It does lot\'s of other cool stuff, too.
The CD-ROM hasn\'t gone the way of the dodo bird yet. Too many of them installed in people\'s cars.
SoX is easy--and free. There are Windows and Mac binaries--and source code, of course. Very good documentation, too.
http://sox.sourceforge.net/Code: [Select]sox.exe -G -r 44100 -b 16 24-bit-input-file.wav 16-bit-output-file.wav
It does lot\'s of other cool stuff, too.