Author Topic: Does anyone have a copy of the new band photograph that is higher than 10X10 pixels? (Read 2567 times)

ds673488 · « **on:** August 21, 2008, 03:09:07 pm »

What a JOKE! i cant believe no one has done anything about this since this picture was first released months ago. I wont comment on the picture itself, but why would they pay money (maybe they didnt) to get a professional looking photo done of the band when blowing it up to a semi-reasonable size makes it look like an abstract art mosaic thing?

Where is a normal size photo of this? On the Backwoods pondfest site all of these 7th tier jam bands have cool looking official pictures, and the Breakfast\'s looks like it was found in a shipwreck dating back to 1720, and then scanned onto a computer from 1985.

http://www.backwoodspondfest.com/bands.html
^^^SORRYYY CHIP

Someone PLEASE take care of this

davepeck · « **Reply #1 on:** August 21, 2008, 03:30:57 pm »

lilblondie · « **Reply #2 on:** August 21, 2008, 03:46:45 pm »

Quote from: ds673488;200103

What a JOKE! i cant believe no one has done anything about this since this picture was first released months ago. I wont comment on the picture itself (which i already ranted about in that other thread a while ago), but why would they pay money (maybe they didnt) to get a professional looking photo done of the band when blowing it up to a semi-reasonable size makes it look like an abstract art mosaic thing?

Where is a normal size photo of this? On the Backwoods pondfest site all of these 7th tier jam bands have cool looking official pictures, and the Breakfast\'s looks like it was found in a shipwreck dating back to 1720, and then scanned onto a computer from 1985.

http://www.backwoodspondfest.com/bands.html
^^^SORRYYY CHIP

Someone PLEASE take care of this

sorry that you have to feel the wrath...but you know what....FU dude...
maybe they liked those photos..and there are a couple people who come to mind that could have taken them and not only are they dear friends of the band but they are very talented artists as well....this is supposed to be a band that you like and support...not critize all the time...i am just getting a little tired of all the negitivity and comments that outsiders have about the bands choices...if you could do it better...then start your own damn band and make them as perfect as you want....good day!

ds673488 · « **Reply #3 on:** August 21, 2008, 04:01:43 pm »

the picture isnt the problem, i just dont get why the resolution is so poor all the time on it. you cant even see any of the band members clearly.

someone must have a high res photo, right?

lilblondie, ouch!

jking · « **Reply #4 on:** August 21, 2008, 04:02:52 pm »

in ds\' defense, if you look at that page he linked, the bfast\'s pic does stand out in not a very good way. its a fine pic, but there needs to be a bigger version so it doesn\'t look distorted when blown up past avatar size.

tyzack · « **Reply #5 on:** August 21, 2008, 04:08:04 pm »

anyone have matlab?

ds673488 · « **Reply #6 on:** August 21, 2008, 04:13:27 pm »

even the photo that dave just put up is indeed larger, but its really really blurry. i cant imagine that the original photograph looked anything like this....someone must have the original with good clarity, i just dont know who does. hence the reason i started this thread.

booztravlr · « **Reply #7 on:** August 21, 2008, 04:18:17 pm »

Quote from: lilblondie;200108

Quote from: ds673488;200103
What a JOKE! i cant believe no one has done anything about this since this picture was first released months ago. I wont comment on the picture itself (which i already ranted about in that other thread a while ago), but why would they pay money (maybe they didnt) to get a professional looking photo done of the band when blowing it up to a semi-reasonable size makes it look like an abstract art mosaic thing?

Where is a normal size photo of this? On the Backwoods pondfest site all of these 7th tier jam bands have cool looking official pictures, and the Breakfast\'s looks like it was found in a shipwreck dating back to 1720, and then scanned onto a computer from 1985.

http://www.backwoodspondfest.com/bands.html
^^^SORRYYY CHIP

Someone PLEASE take care of this

sorry that you have to feel the wrath...but you know what....FU dude...
maybe they liked those photos..and there are a couple people who come to mind that could have taken them and not only are they dear friends of the band but they are very talented artists as well....this is supposed to be a band that you like and support...not critize all the time...i am just getting a little tired of all the negitivity and comments that outsiders have about the bands choices...if you could do it better...then start your own damn band and make them as perfect as you want....good day!

Damn. With all the sand in there you might have a pearl forming.

All he was looking for was a higher resolution picture so if you want to view it at a larger size it doesn\'t look like nintendo graphics. Expand the picture Dave posted and you\'ll see what he\'s talking about.

Vassillios · « **Reply #8 on:** August 21, 2008, 04:19:37 pm »

Quote from: davepeck;200104

this is perfect!

lilblondie · « **Reply #9 on:** August 21, 2008, 04:24:54 pm »

Quote from: booztravlr;200113

Quote from: lilblondie;200108
Quote from: ds673488;200103
What a JOKE! i cant believe no one has done anything about this since this picture was first released months ago. I wont comment on the picture itself (which i already ranted about in that other thread a while ago), but why would they pay money (maybe they didnt) to get a professional looking photo done of the band when blowing it up to a semi-reasonable size makes it look like an abstract art mosaic thing?

Where is a normal size photo of this? On the Backwoods pondfest site all of these 7th tier jam bands have cool looking official pictures, and the Breakfast\'s looks like it was found in a shipwreck dating back to 1720, and then scanned onto a computer from 1985.

http://www.backwoodspondfest.com/bands.html
^^^SORRYYY CHIP

Someone PLEASE take care of this

sorry that you have to feel the wrath...but you know what....FU dude...
maybe they liked those photos..and there are a couple people who come to mind that could have taken them and not only are they dear friends of the band but they are very talented artists as well....this is supposed to be a band that you like and support...not critize all the time...i am just getting a little tired of all the negitivity and comments that outsiders have about the bands choices...if you could do it better...then start your own damn band and make them as perfect as you want....good day!

Damn. With all the sand in there you might have a pearl forming.

All he was looking for was a higher resolution picture so if you want to view it at a larger size it doesn\'t look like nintendo graphics. Expand the picture Dave posted and you\'ll see what he\'s talking about.

its not about the picture...its about his first little paragraph there...thats what made all the sand my friend...

Yoda · « **Reply #10 on:** August 21, 2008, 04:28:34 pm »

He/She without sin may throw the first stone. I myself aint touching this one with a ten foot pole.

skalnbyc · « **Reply #11 on:** August 21, 2008, 05:17:16 pm »

Quote from: ds673488;200103

On the Backwoods pondfest site all of these 7th tier jam bands have cool looking official pictures, and the Breakfast\'s looks like it was found in a shipwreck dating back to 1720, and then scanned onto a computer from 1985.

That\'s actually pretty funny.

The Breakfast is definitely the sore thumb on that lineup. Yikes.

ChrisF · « **Reply #12 on:** August 21, 2008, 05:30:09 pm »

Quote from: ds673488;200112

even the photo that dave just put up is indeed larger, but its really really blurry. i cant imagine that the original photograph looked anything like this...

im pretty sure dave just posted that as a joke.

the band must have just kept the proof and decided not to buy the full res version. or bought prints only and never made a digital version other than the proof.

FreeSpirit · « **Reply #13 on:** August 21, 2008, 05:31:26 pm »

Quote from: ds673488;200112

i cant imagine that the original photograph looked anything like this....someone must have the original with good clarity, i just dont know who does. hence the reason i started this thread.

I believe Jackie Greenberg took this photo, and probably has a better copy of it?

skalnbyc · « **Reply #14 on:** August 21, 2008, 06:02:42 pm »

Quote from: davepeck;200104

^^^^^^^^^
funny picture thread----->------->------->-------->