or is this not good for the band ? i think it would be good exposure and really convenient in everyday occurrences (i spend a lot of time on the comp for school and wastin time) if it\'s possible how do we go about it (never uploaded anything on youtube) ? some zone one and bona fide and what not would be sick on youtube, some of the best versions of songs i\'ve ever heard. any thoughts/life lessons?
My suggestion is not to use album tracks.
Use live cuts off archive.org or whatever recordings you have.
There\'s probably 100 better live versions than on any album anyway.
I don\'t know if the band would outright object to using their studio material... and nobody can really stop you from doing it... but considering they let us tape everything and are pretty chill about whatever nannies we pull from time to time, I\'d let studio/album tracks stay on the album.
Trust me I\'ve been tempted to spread Adrian\'s album by whatever means possible just so people can hear it.
That said, hook up a copy of Zone 1, brah. Ain\'t got that
****.
well there are already a million versions of everything live on youtube. its not like you can burn the youtube songs or anything i don\'t see it hurting the band really just seems like better exposure.
i actually just got my hands on zone one after not having it for years. pretty refreshing
****!
i know there is tons of live stuff, but i like raging youtube listening to songs that i unfortunately don\'t have. ive gotten to love ween and a few other bands because i\'m able to pull up any song i want to personally listen to or to show someone else.
i understand if the band (or adrian\'s vessel) do not want that, but i really dont think its going to deter from people buying their stuff, it just peeks interest to people tryign to get turned on by them.
if we could pull up bona fide\'s rufus at any given moment there would be lots more fans (no guitar solo like that should ever be a secret)