News:

One fat hen couple duck three brown bear four running hare five fat fickle female sitting sipping scotch six simple simon sitting on a stone seven sinbad sailors sailed the seven seas eight egotistical egoists echoing egotistical ecstasies nine nude nublians nimbly nibbling nuts gnats nicotine ten was and never was a fig plucker nor a fig plucker's son and I ain't leaving till this fucking fig pluckin's done now ask me if I am a turtle. (Tim) Are you a turtle? (Wolf) You bet your sweet ass I'm a turtle. Once a turtle, always a turtle!

Author Topic: Reba question  (Read 1641 times)

0 Members and 1928 Guests are viewing this topic.

Reba question
« on: »
I haven\'t heard as many live Phish versions of Reba as most of you, but the few I have heard are a bit faster than the tempo that the Breakfast plays them at. Is this generally true of Phish\'s Reba vs. The Breakfast\'s Reba? Not that it makes the Breakfast cover any less impressive, but it always feels the slightest bit slow to me.
Go see your Breakfast, there are starving Leiths in California

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Reba question
« Reply #1 on: »
Breakfast covers it at Lawn Boy album pace, since they covered it at last years Freakout. They\'ve done some cool things with the jam since then but Phish definitely had a few more gos at it to switch up tempo.

But yeah Phish did speed things up a bit before they slowed it way down.
Put the pointed pencil in the pepper-po and take a little sniff of the things below. :sadban:

> > > forums.alpinezone.com > > > Pelland Advertising

Reba question
« Reply #2 on: »
the version in naragansett (the best breakfast version thus far), is up to the fast phish tempo (94-96 era)
DS Newbers

Reba question
« Reply #3 on: »
i\'m pretty sure the super fast versions of phish\'s reba had to do with some ser intake of uppers
*Gia*

Reba question
« Reply #4 on: »
I have always felt that there was a big difference between fast phish and good phish

Reba question
« Reply #5 on: »
concur\'d
taints rule, gypsies drool!