Paul is exactly right. I could go on forever about the whole SCA/Jam thing.
It\'s simple..... Score, Rufus, Coma = songs in between the two segments of Gladys.... Leith, you obviously don\'t understand the definition of inverted. It\'s not my definition, it\'s the one used by everybody. There can\'t be anything in between the Gladys segments for it to be inverted. End of story! Plus as I keep saying there was no Gladys ending so it can\'t be dyslexic or inverted!
Adrian\'s quote was simply describing how they wanted to play it, it wasn\'t a commentary on how he thought it should be labeled. The labeling was done by the archivist, right?
And btw I\'m not upset, I have a smile on my face and am enjoying discussing this.
We\'re just gonna have to agree to disagree.
I just don\'t get why you wouldn\'t want dyslexic in the setlists if that\'s what you felt was accurate. Does the word scare you or something? It\'s just like inverted, just a little different. Just another way of having fun with the song, instead of doing the normal A > B > C. That\'s all... no big deal. Bisco has nothing to do with reporting the setlist accurately.
What if the archivist didn\'t want inverted in the setlists? Does that mean it\'s right? Dyslexic absolutely should be used when applicable. Just because you and whoever else wants to exclude it doesn\'t mean it\'s right...