gado = mvp
Albert Pujols is the NL MVP, no doubt about it.
For the record,
Page 2 made the argument much more eloquently than I am about to. If you really care, you should read their article instead. My post is a cross between the cliff notes of that article and my own thoughts. Anyway...
Pujols\' batting average more or less equals Delgado\'s on-base percentage. Plus, Delgado has been batting either between or behind David Wright and Carlos Beltran, whereas Pujols is batting in a lineup where his batting average is 40 points higher than that of the next best hitter. Pujols is in the top five in a ridiculous number of hitting categories. Delgado leads Pujols only in home runs (by 3) and RBI (by 2).
As for the argument that the MVP needs to come from a playoff team, is it really Pujols\' fault, looking at his numbers, that his team isn\'t in the playoffs? Wild card race not withstanding, his team is going to be at least .500 and has a chance to finish with a better record than the NL West Champion. I do believe that the MVP shouldn\'t come from a last place team, but it shouldn\'t fall in Pujols\' lap that his team finished six games out of the wild race behind a team like the Mets that has a far superior lineup.
And this is not attack on Klout, the Mets or Carlos Delgado. There is a case for Delgado as MVP from the "inspirational story" and "team leader" perspective. But my career as a stat-hound has definitely shaped my definition of the Most Valuable Player.
Mmmm... longwinded and unnecessary.