The Breakfast.info

General Discussions => Spunk => Topic started by: skalnbyc on May 16, 2005, 03:51:02 pm

Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: skalnbyc on May 16, 2005, 03:51:02 pm
Most Breakfast fans either do not know the distinct usages of the two or simply do not care to use the appropriate term when necessary.  Also problematic is their vs. there vs. they\'re.  

I\'m just not sure why so many people fail to use these basic words correctly.
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Overexjoesure on May 16, 2005, 03:54:10 pm
You\'re point is taken Al.  Their is a huge problem with grammatical error on this site.  Maybe we can add a grammer checker on here.
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Jim Cobb on May 16, 2005, 03:54:47 pm
go to any message board.  it\'s a universal problem with internet geeks in general.
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Todd on May 16, 2005, 03:58:23 pm
Universal problem with the youngins in general...see age has it\'s perks ;)
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Mamalakabubadaya on May 16, 2005, 04:00:35 pm
i do a pretty good job remembering that one..punctuation/grammar has always come very naturally to me..
but how bout them:
                     
                     its vs. it\'s
                     then vs. than
                     to vs. too vs. two
                     there vs. their vs. they\'re
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Mamalakabubadaya on May 16, 2005, 04:01:43 pm
ooh!! also

except vs. accept (i\'ve seen some people screw this up before..dreadful)
affect vs. effect
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: mcajam on May 16, 2005, 04:31:40 pm
your all nerds
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Jim Cobb on May 16, 2005, 05:08:35 pm
Quote from: Mamalakabubadaya
i\'m do a pretty good job remembering that one..punctuation/grammar has always come very naturally to me..
but how bout them:
                     
                     its vs. it\'s
                     then vs. than
                     to vs. too vs. two
                     there vs. their vs. they\'re

i\'m do a pretty good job...  (i do a pretty good job)
how bout them (how about these)
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Mamalakabubadaya on May 16, 2005, 05:10:38 pm
son of a gun!!
well nothing i say here really matters too much anyway..got an A in english the last 2 semesters, i pay attention when i counts
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: ulee on May 16, 2005, 05:26:38 pm
i don\'t know why but f-ed up grammar irritates the hell out of me
ESPECIALLY
 
unnecessary apostrophes EVERYWHERE!!!
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: jocelyn on May 16, 2005, 08:18:11 pm
Quote from: Todd
Universal problem with the youngins in general...see age has it\'s perks ;)


AAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA TODDDDDDDD AHAHAHAHA

Its perks, not it\'s perks, unless you meant "age has it is perks".

:point:

Senile old raisin...
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Todd on May 17, 2005, 01:07:31 am
:duck:
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Todd on May 17, 2005, 01:08:57 am
OOOhhhh.......and my grapes are NOT wrinkled ;)
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Gordo on May 17, 2005, 02:47:30 am
i\'m in good standing on this subject.

for the record, i\'ve seen freddie drop a lot of:

"of coArse."
^^^^^^^(wanted to make that plural but wasnt sure if there is an apostrophe after the \'e\' or not)  ;)

p.s. i\'m young. bitches.
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Wolfman on May 17, 2005, 06:25:23 am
Quote from: Gordo
i\'m in good standing on this subject.



Capital "I" BITCH!  Use you\'re damn shift key its not hard, their are even too of them!  Oh yeah, definitly is definetly a word that noone nose how two spell!
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Todd on May 17, 2005, 07:24:49 am
rotfl
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: derickw on May 17, 2005, 09:18:56 am
What does it really matter. is someone sending me a gold star if i spell correctly. i know what your say\'n and you know what i\'m say\'n.

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid. Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn\'t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt!
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: JSleeper240 on May 17, 2005, 09:48:58 am
I can\'t stand when you go into a store or restaurant and they have a sign that says "No shirt, no shoe\'s, no service", the shoes do not belong to anyone.  Or something like "Hat\'s - $4", again, no ownership. It contradicts good grammar and is a shame because kids and other people see it and assume it\'s the proper usage, almost enforces it.
I, like others on this board am a victim of the East Haven school system, but hey, I tuned out just fine...kinda, right ???
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: jocelyn on May 17, 2005, 10:59:37 am
Quote from: Gordo
i\'m in good standing on this subject.

for the record, i\'ve seen freddie drop a lot of:

"of coArse."
^^^^^^^(wanted to make that plural but wasnt sure if there is an apostrophe after the \'e\' or not)  ;)


Well there is definitely an apostrophe in "wasn\'t."
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: jocelyn on May 17, 2005, 11:00:27 am
Quote from: Wolfman
Quote from: Gordo
i\'m in good standing on this subject.



Capital "I" BITCH!  Use you\'re damn shift key its not hard, their are even too of them!  Oh yeah, definitly is definetly a word that noone nose how two spell!


"TWO" of them BITCH! ;)
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: skalnbyc on May 17, 2005, 05:02:33 pm
Quote from: derickw
What does it really matter. is someone sending me a gold star if i spell correctly. i know what your say\'n and you know what i\'m say\'n.


Grammatical mistakes don\'t mesh well in a professional environment (casual organizations/entities included).  Sure they are harmless mistakes online, but many new entrants into the working world do not know how to properly communicate with their coworkers (email) or with external parties such as clients.  This becomes a major competitive disadvantage in one\'s career.
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Gordo on May 17, 2005, 06:26:51 pm
Quote from: Wolfman
Quote from: Gordo
i\'m in good standing on this subject.



Capital "I" BITCH!  Use you\'re damn shift key its not hard, their are even too of them!  Oh yeah, definitly is definetly a word that noone nose how two spell!


what? you wanna go fucker?

 :hand:

palease bro.

 ;)
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Gordo on May 17, 2005, 06:30:57 pm
;)
Quote from: jocelyn
Quote from: Wolfman
Quote from: Gordo
i\'m in good standing on this subject.



Capital "I" BITCH!  Use you\'re damn shift key its not hard, their are even too of them!  Oh yeah, definitly is definetly a word that noone nose how two spell!


"TWO" of them BITCH! ;)


did jocelyn miss the whole point of Wolfy\'s post here????
errors:
1.you\'re -- your
2.its -- it\'s
3.their -- there
4.too -- two
5.definitly/definetly -- definitely
6.noone -- no one
7.nose -- knows
8.two -- to

all you call out is the TWO........ BIATCH!
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: jocelyn on May 18, 2005, 12:05:54 pm
lol ooopsies probably would have noticed the others if I wasn\'t so stuck on the one... ha... and not noticing the others caused me to miss the whole point of the post... he hehe
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: antbach on May 18, 2005, 01:17:33 pm
I\'ll back Sleeper up on the East Haven school system. We all turned out aight, for the most part. And I honestly think that people no wich term of the multipal usage words they meen to say, but when tiping the fingers go wear they want.

Then again, as I stated, I am a product of the East Haven Ejukayshun Sistum, so what do i no?
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: FrankZappa on May 18, 2005, 01:55:38 pm
I remeber dave emailing something years ago. (pre-board i think) about how when we read, we only look at the first and last letter of the word, so you can change everything around inside and people can still understand it. The whole email was written in that style as well. Kinda like this:

Icnnnoet Hrary
Bkore dwon on the raod
Ndeeed aitssscane blday
Got out to wlak hmoe
He saw smoe lhitgs
Hlep is on the way
The wnid was kckiin\' taht nhigt
A mialtcurk was dleday

Hrary look yuor wtis are on the pmaeenvt
I\'m srue you wree a good guy iigltlnneet
If you uesd yuor biran it may not cmae tihs aedicnct
But who wlil konw no one wlil konw yuor rael itnent
His rael itnent...

Was he a dgnear teakr
Iraentrbeid
A Czary gzear
Liokong for raod haed
It was mroe suieros
Lnae atcprpeiioan
He lvoed wtihe lhigt
The rsik dmeicitaon

An FLA nvaite who ctomeetlpand
The qistueon is, is his lfie wtorh svain\'
And who dvore by but Sveatn on vtaacoin
And saw the fanil suttiiaon waht a smahe man
Waht a smahe man...

He\'s Hrad Lcuk Hrary, say bye to a good guy
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Gordo on May 18, 2005, 02:49:02 pm
Quote from: derickw
What does it really matter. is someone sending me a gold star if i spell correctly. i know what your say\'n and you know what i\'m say\'n.

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid. Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn\'t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt!
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: boombox on May 19, 2005, 01:04:40 pm
Quote from: ulee
i don\'t know why but f-ed up grammar irritates the hell out of me
ESPECIALLY
 
unnecessary apostrophes EVERYWHERE!!!


I am with you on this: I recently saw some signs in a window for an advertising company promoting "CD\'s". Whose CDs for Zarquod\'s sake?!!

However, the worst misuse of the apostrophe has to be in 1960\'s, 1970\'s etc.

For a very humorous analysis of punctuation, I suggest the following:
"Eats Shoots and Leaves" by Lynne Truss. It was Book of the Year in 2004 over here.
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: jocelyn on May 19, 2005, 05:12:02 pm
Quote from: boombox
Quote from: ulee
i don\'t know why but f-ed up grammar irritates the hell out of me
ESPECIALLY
 
unnecessary apostrophes EVERYWHERE!!!


I am with you on this: I recently saw some signs in a window for an advertising company promoting "CD\'s". Whose CDs for Zarquod\'s sake?!!

However, the worst misuse of the apostrophe has to be in 1960\'s, 1970\'s etc.

For a very humorous analysis of punctuation, I suggest the following:
"Eats Shoots and Leaves" by Lynne Truss. It was Book of the Year in 2004 over here.


I think the it\'s not a matter of whose cds, but a matter of \'what does the cd possess?\' With an apostophe after the \'d\' I think it implies that the cd has something. The cd\'s __________. The cd\'s crummy pop songs made me nauseous. The cd\'s label has some slutbag on it. Etc.

This is REALLY important. heh.
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Wolfman on May 19, 2005, 06:07:44 pm
Quote from: boombox

However, the worst misuse of the apostrophe has to be in 1960\'s, 1970\'s etc.


Maybe it\'s different in the UK and we just stupidized it in America, but this is actually the appropriate grammar.  Plural abbreviations and numbers get an apostrophe before the S so there is not confusion as to whether the S is part of the abbreviation or number.  i.e. UFO\'s, POW\'s, 1960\'s.  The possessive for an abbreviation or number looks exactly the same as the plural, so it is up to the reader to know whether the author intended a possessive or a plural.  It\'s usually not hard to figure out.
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: boombox on May 21, 2005, 02:28:41 pm
Quote from: Wolfman
Quote from: boombox

However, the worst misuse of the apostrophe has to be in 1960\'s, 1970\'s etc.


Maybe it\'s different in the UK and we just stupidized it in America.


:lol:
Title: The official "your" vs. "you\'re" thread...
Post by: FreeSpirit on August 27, 2008, 07:50:33 am
Alright, so this stuff usually doesn\'t bug me, but it\'s happening way too often here on .info.  Since everyone else has a bitching thread in progress, here\'s mine:

“You’re” is always a contraction of “you are.” If you’ve written “you’re,” try substituting “you are.” If it doesn’t work, the word you want is “your.”

"your" is a possessive pronoun, like his, hers, or theirs.  It means ownership and usually follows a noun.

My first graders learn this skill in November, so there\'s hope for you too!  Some people I\'ve seen  who don\'t know this skill include (but are not limited to):  freddiewah, Yoda


/rant ;)
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: FrankZappa on August 27, 2008, 08:19:23 am
yeah, allot of use people Mrs. Spell you\'re wurds on the massage bored.
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Dweasel Weasel on August 27, 2008, 08:27:05 am
Amen Robin.  

How about: "The Who? Their great."
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: postom on August 27, 2008, 08:34:31 am
i\'d chime in with my pet peeve, the \'s, but there is already a thread about that.
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: oldnewbie on August 27, 2008, 09:12:59 am
This Isnt Skool!!!!!!
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Drew_Kingsley on August 27, 2008, 09:22:01 am
Alternate Title: The official "nit" vs. "pick" thread
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: bezerker on August 27, 2008, 09:23:40 am
whatever d00d
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: NickNels on August 27, 2008, 10:13:05 am
Your too overcrtical.  You\'re thread is bringing me down
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: ds673488 on August 27, 2008, 10:16:24 am
while we are on the topic of words, is "ain\'t" now an official word?
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: FrankZappa on August 27, 2008, 10:51:39 am
Code: [Select]
even if it is, so is
Taumatawhakatangihangakoauauotamateaturipukakapikimaungahoronukupokaiwhenuakitanatahu,
but I\'d still rather just say "hill"
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: NickNels on August 27, 2008, 11:00:00 am
Humuhumunukunukuapua
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: peaches626 on August 27, 2008, 01:03:21 pm
why can\'t i see who started this thread?
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: FrankZappa on August 27, 2008, 01:12:53 pm
maybe you blocked them?
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: peaches626 on August 27, 2008, 01:17:02 pm
fair enough...
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: ds673488 on August 27, 2008, 01:29:00 pm
it was robyn, for the record (just to boost the awkwardness, and assuming you can even read my post here if you didnt block me also)
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Mark on August 27, 2008, 02:16:18 pm
your a bunch of idiots
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: skalnbyc on August 27, 2008, 08:02:41 pm
I authored the same thread about 3 - 4 years ago.
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: ChrisF on August 27, 2008, 09:04:41 pm
Quote from: alexanderzurflu;200722
I authored the same thread about 3 - 4 years ago.


and you didnt even have a teacher\'s edition to copy and paste from.
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: skalnbyc on August 28, 2008, 01:45:04 am
Next topic (which was also covered years ago):

They\'re/Their/There
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: jocelyn on August 28, 2008, 09:52:00 am
Quote from: ChrisF;200725
Quote from: alexanderzurflu;200722
I authored the same thread about 3 - 4 years ago.

and you didnt even have a teacher\'s edition to copy and paste from.

:point:
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: FrankZappa on August 28, 2008, 10:21:53 am
"answers! precious answers!"
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: peaches626 on August 28, 2008, 02:12:20 pm
thank you dsnumbers, you\'ve cleared it all up...
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: ulee on September 19, 2008, 10:41:11 am
and if your name is Sally...
and if you\'re a little munchkin..
love that song and it\'s a great way to practice grammar
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: ds673488 on September 19, 2008, 11:01:00 am
i could have sworn people were posting in this thread recently (after 5-21-05)
Title: Your vs. You\'re [MERGED]
Post by: Gordo on September 19, 2008, 12:41:35 pm
Quote from: ds673488;203441
i could have sworn people were posting in this thread recently (after 5-21-05)


Not sure what you\'re talking about dude. Seems to be plenty of August \'08 posts.